| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191119062151.777260-1-andriin@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:21:51 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix call relocation offset calculation bug
When relocating subprogram call, libbpf doesn't take into account
relo->text_off, which comes from symbol's value. This generally works fine for
subprograms implemented as static functions, but breaks for global functions.
Taking a simplified test_pkt_access.c as an example:
__attribute__ ((noinline))
static int test_pkt_access_subprog1(volatile struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->len * 2;
}
__attribute__ ((noinline))
static int test_pkt_access_subprog2(int val, volatile struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->len + val;
}
SEC("classifier/test_pkt_access")
int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
if (test_pkt_access_subprog1(skb) != skb->len * 2)
return TC_ACT_SHOT;
if (test_pkt_access_subprog2(2, skb) != skb->len + 2)
return TC_ACT_SHOT;
return TC_ACT_UNSPEC;
}
When compiled, we get two relocations, pointing to '.text' symbol. .text has
st_value set to 0 (it points to the beginning of .text section):
0000000000000008 000000050000000a R_BPF_64_32 0000000000000000 .text
0000000000000040 000000050000000a R_BPF_64_32 0000000000000000 .text
test_pkt_access_subprog1 and test_pkt_access_subprog2 offsets (targets of two
calls) are encoded within call instruction's imm32 part as -1 and 2,
respectively:
0000000000000000 test_pkt_access_subprog1:
0: 61 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
1: 64 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 w0 <<= 1
2: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
0000000000000018 test_pkt_access_subprog2:
3: 61 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
4: 04 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 w0 += 2
5: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
0000000000000000 test_pkt_access:
0: bf 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 r6 = r1
===> 1: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
2: bc 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = w0
3: b4 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 w0 = 2
4: 61 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = *(u32 *)(r6 + 0)
5: 64 02 00 00 01 00 00 00 w2 <<= 1
6: 5e 21 08 00 00 00 00 00 if w1 != w2 goto +8 <LBB0_3>
7: bf 61 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r6
===> 8: 85 10 00 00 02 00 00 00 call 2
9: bc 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = w0
10: 61 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = *(u32 *)(r6 + 0)
11: 04 02 00 00 02 00 00 00 w2 += 2
12: b4 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff w0 = -1
13: 1e 21 01 00 00 00 00 00 if w1 == w2 goto +1 <LBB0_3>
14: b4 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 w0 = 2
0000000000000078 LBB0_3:
15: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
Now, if we compile example with global functions, the setup changes.
Relocations are now against specifically test_pkt_access_subprog1 and
test_pkt_access_subprog2 symbols, with test_pkt_access_subprog2 pointing 24
bytes into its respective section (.text), i.e., 3 instructions in:
0000000000000008 000000070000000a R_BPF_64_32 0000000000000000 test_pkt_access_subprog1
0000000000000048 000000080000000a R_BPF_64_32 0000000000000018 test_pkt_access_subprog2
Calls instructions now encode offsets relative to function symbols and are both
set ot -1:
0000000000000000 test_pkt_access_subprog1:
0: 61 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
1: 64 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 w0 <<= 1
2: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
0000000000000018 test_pkt_access_subprog2:
3: 61 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0)
4: 0c 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 w0 += w1
5: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
0000000000000000 test_pkt_access:
0: bf 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 r6 = r1
===> 1: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
2: bc 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = w0
3: b4 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 w0 = 2
4: 61 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = *(u32 *)(r6 + 0)
5: 64 02 00 00 01 00 00 00 w2 <<= 1
6: 5e 21 09 00 00 00 00 00 if w1 != w2 goto +9 <LBB2_3>
7: b4 01 00 00 02 00 00 00 w1 = 2
8: bf 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = r6
===> 9: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
10: bc 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = w0
11: 61 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = *(u32 *)(r6 + 0)
12: 04 02 00 00 02 00 00 00 w2 += 2
13: b4 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff w0 = -1
14: 1e 21 01 00 00 00 00 00 if w1 == w2 goto +1 <LBB2_3>
15: b4 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 w0 = 2
0000000000000080 LBB2_3:
16: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
Thus the right formula to calculate target call offset after relocation should
take into account relocation's target symbol value (offset within section),
call instruction's imm32 offset, and (subtracting, to get relative instruction
offset) instruction index of call instruction itself. All that is shifted by
number of instructions in main program, given all sub-programs are copied over
after main program.
Convert test_pkt_access.c to global functions to verify this works.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 8 ++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 15e91a1d6c11..a7d183f7ac72 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1870,9 +1870,13 @@ bpf_program__collect_reloc(struct bpf_program *prog, GElf_Shdr *shdr,
pr_warn("incorrect bpf_call opcode\n");
return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
}
+ if (sym.st_value % 8) {
+ pr_warn("bad call relo offset: %lu\n", sym.st_value);
+ return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
+ }
prog->reloc_desc[i].type = RELO_CALL;
prog->reloc_desc[i].insn_idx = insn_idx;
- prog->reloc_desc[i].text_off = sym.st_value;
+ prog->reloc_desc[i].text_off = sym.st_value / 8;
obj->has_pseudo_calls = true;
continue;
}
@@ -3573,7 +3577,7 @@ bpf_program__reloc_text(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_object *obj,
prog->section_name);
}
insn = &prog->insns[relo->insn_idx];
- insn->imm += prog->main_prog_cnt - relo->insn_idx;
+ insn->imm += relo->text_off + prog->main_prog_cnt - relo->insn_idx;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
index 3a7b4b607ed3..dd0d2dfe55d8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
@@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ int _version SEC("version") = 1;
*
* Which makes it an interesting test for BTF-enabled verifier.
*/
-static __attribute__ ((noinline))
-int test_pkt_access_subprog1(volatile struct __sk_buff *skb)
+__attribute__ ((noinline))
+int test_pkt_access_subprog1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->len * 2;
}
-static __attribute__ ((noinline))
-int test_pkt_access_subprog2(int val, volatile struct __sk_buff *skb)
+__attribute__ ((noinline))
+int test_pkt_access_subprog2(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->len * val;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists