netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] selftests: qdiscs: Add test coverage for ETS Qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o8x6d05t.fsf@mellanox.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:42:40 +0000
From:   Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
To:     Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] selftests: qdiscs: Add test coverage for ETS
 Qdisc


Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com> writes:

> Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com> writes:
>
>> Add TDC coverage for the new ETS Qdisc.
>>
>
> It would be good to have tests for upper bound limits of qdisc
> parameters.

All right. I can think of "bands 16", and then "quantum $(((1 << 32) -
1))", but I'm not sure the latter is very useful. Did you have anything
else in mind?