lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:36:09 +0000
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
        Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: add generic support for lookup and
 lookup_and_delete batch ops



On 11/19/19 11:30 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> This commit introduces generic support for the bpf_map_lookup_batch and
> bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch ops. This implementation can be used by
> almost all the bpf maps since its core implementation is relying on the
> existing map_get_next_key, map_lookup_elem and map_delete_elem
> functions. The bpf syscall subcommands introduced are:
> 
>    BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH
>    BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH
> 
> The UAPI attribute is:
> 
>    struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */
>           __aligned_u64   in_batch;       /* start batch,
>                                            * NULL to start from beginning
>                                            */
>           __aligned_u64   out_batch;      /* output: next start batch */
>           __aligned_u64   keys;
>           __aligned_u64   values;
>           __u32           count;          /* input/output:
>                                            * input: # of key/value
>                                            * elements
>                                            * output: # of filled elements
>                                            */
>           __u32           map_fd;
>           __u64           elem_flags;
>           __u64           flags;
>    } batch;
> 
> in_batch/out_batch are opaque values use to communicate between
> user/kernel space, in_batch/out_batch must be of key_size length.
> 
> To start iterating from the beginning in_batch must be null,
> count is the # of key/value elements to retrieve. Note that the 'keys'
> buffer must be a buffer of key_size * count size and the 'values' buffer
> must be value_size * count, where value_size must be aligned to 8 bytes
> by userspace if it's dealing with percpu maps. 'count' will contain the
> number of keys/values successfully retrieved. Note that 'count' is an
> input/output variable and it can contain a lower value after a call.
> 
> If there's no more entries to retrieve, ENOENT will be returned. If error
> is ENOENT, count might be > 0 in case it copied some values but there were
> no more entries to retrieve.
> 
> Note that if the return code is an error and not -EFAULT,
> count indicates the number of elements successfully processed.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
>   include/linux/bpf.h      |  11 +++
>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  19 +++++
>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c     | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 5b81cde47314e..767a823dbac74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
>   	int (*map_get_next_key)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key);
>   	void (*map_release_uref)(struct bpf_map *map);
>   	void *(*map_lookup_elem_sys_only)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> +	int (*map_lookup_batch)(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +				union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
> +	int (*map_lookup_and_delete_batch)(struct bpf_map *map,
> +					   const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +					   union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
>   
>   	/* funcs callable from userspace and from eBPF programs */
>   	void *(*map_lookup_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> @@ -797,6 +802,12 @@ void bpf_map_charge_move(struct bpf_map_memory *dst,
>   void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size, int numa_node);
>   void bpf_map_area_free(void *base);
>   void bpf_map_init_from_attr(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr);
> +int  generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
> +			      const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +			      union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
> +int  generic_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
> +					 const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +					 union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
>   
>   extern int sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled;
>   
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 4842a134b202a..e60b7b7cda61a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
>   	BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM,
>   	BPF_MAP_FREEZE,
>   	BPF_BTF_GET_NEXT_ID,
> +	BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH,
> +	BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH,
>   };
>   
>   enum bpf_map_type {
> @@ -400,6 +402,23 @@ union bpf_attr {
>   		__u64		flags;
>   	};
>   
> +	struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */
> +		__aligned_u64	in_batch;	/* start batch,
> +						 * NULL to start from beginning
> +						 */
> +		__aligned_u64	out_batch;	/* output: next start batch */
> +		__aligned_u64	keys;
> +		__aligned_u64	values;
> +		__u32		count;		/* input/output:
> +						 * input: # of key/value
> +						 * elements
> +						 * output: # of filled elements
> +						 */
> +		__u32		map_fd;
> +		__u64		elem_flags;
> +		__u64		flags;
> +	} batch;
> +
>   	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_LOAD command */
>   		__u32		prog_type;	/* one of enum bpf_prog_type */
>   		__u32		insn_cnt;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index cc714c9d5b4cc..d0d3d0e0eaca4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,124 @@ static int map_get_next_key(union bpf_attr *attr)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> +static int __generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
> +				      const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +				      union bpf_attr __user *uattr,
> +				      bool do_delete)
> +{
> +	void __user *ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.in_batch);
> +	void __user *uobatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.out_batch);
> +	void __user *values = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.values);
> +	void __user *keys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys);
> +	void *buf, *prev_key, *key, *value;
> +	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
> +	bool first_key = false;
> +	int err, retry = 3;
> +
> +	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
> +	    !map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err_put;
> +	}

Direct return -EINVAL?

> +
> +	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE ||
> +	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK) {
> +		err = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		goto err_put;
> +	}

Direct return -ENOTSUPP?

> +
> +	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
> +
> +	max_count = attr->batch.count;
> +	if (!max_count)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	err = -ENOMEM;
> +	buf = kmalloc(map->key_size + value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +	if (!buf)
> +		goto err_put;

Direct return -ENOMEM?

> +
> +	err = -EFAULT;
> +	first_key = false;
> +	if (ubatch && copy_from_user(buf, ubatch, map->key_size))
> +		goto free_buf;
> +	key = buf;
> +	value = key + map->key_size;
> +	if (!ubatch) {
> +		prev_key = NULL;
> +		first_key = true;
> +	}
> +
> +
One extra line.

> +	for (cp = 0; cp < max_count; cp++) {
> +		if (cp || first_key) {
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			err = map->ops->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		err = bpf_map_copy_value(map, key, value,
> +					 attr->batch.elem_flags, do_delete);
> +
> +		if (err == -ENOENT) {
> +			if (retry) {
> +				retry--;

What is the 'retry' semantics here? After 'continue', cp++ is executed.

> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			err = -EINTR;

Why returning -EINTR?

> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			goto free_buf;
> +
> +		if (copy_to_user(keys + cp * map->key_size, key,
> +				 map->key_size)) {
> +			err = -EFAULT;
> +			goto free_buf;
> +		}
> +		if (copy_to_user(values + cp * value_size, value, value_size)) {
> +			err = -EFAULT;
> +			goto free_buf;
> +		}
> +
> +		prev_key = key;
> +		retry = 3;
> +	}
> +	if (!err) {
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		err = map->ops->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key);

if err != 0, the 'key' will be invalid and it cannot be used by below 
copy_to_user.

> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +	} > +
> +	if ((copy_to_user(&uattr->batch.count, &cp, sizeof(cp)) ||

The 'cp' may not be accurate if 'retry' is triggered in the above.

> +		    (copy_to_user(uobatch, key, map->key_size))))
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +
> +free_buf:
> +	kfree(buf);
> +err_put:

err_put can be removed.

> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
> +			     const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +			     union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> +{
> +	return __generic_map_lookup_batch(map, attr, uattr, false);
> +}
> +
> +int generic_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
> +					const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +					union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> +{
> +	return __generic_map_lookup_batch(map, attr, uattr, true);
> +}
> +
>   #define BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM_LAST_FIELD value
>   
>   static int map_lookup_and_delete_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
> @@ -2956,6 +3074,57 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> +#define BPF_MAP_BATCH_LAST_FIELD batch.flags
> +
> +#define BPF_DO_BATCH(fn)			\
> +	do {					\
> +		if (!fn) {			\
> +			err = -ENOTSUPP;	\
> +			goto err_put;		\
> +		}				\
> +		err = fn(map, attr, uattr);	\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +static int bpf_map_do_batch(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> +			    union bpf_attr __user *uattr,
> +			    int cmd)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_map *map;
> +	int err, ufd;
> +	struct fd f;
> +
> +	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_BATCH))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ufd = attr->batch.map_fd;
> +	f = fdget(ufd);
> +	map = __bpf_map_get(f);
> +	if (IS_ERR(map))
> +		return PTR_ERR(map);
> +
> +	if ((cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH ||
> +	     cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH) &&
> +	    !(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ)) {
> +		err = -EPERM;
> +		goto err_put;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cmd != BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH &&

Here should be BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH.
BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH does not need FMODE_CAN_WRITE.

> +	    !(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_WRITE)) {
> +		err = -EPERM;
> +		goto err_put;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cmd == BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH)
> +		BPF_DO_BATCH(map->ops->map_lookup_batch);
> +	else
> +		BPF_DO_BATCH(map->ops->map_lookup_and_delete_batch);
> +
> +err_put:
> +	fdput(f);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>   SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, size)
>   {
>   	union bpf_attr attr = {};
> @@ -3053,6 +3222,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz
>   	case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM:
>   		err = map_lookup_and_delete_elem(&attr);
>   		break;
> +	case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH:
> +		err = bpf_map_do_batch(&attr, uattr, BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_BATCH);
> +		break;
> +	case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH:
> +		err = bpf_map_do_batch(&attr, uattr,
> +				       BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH);
> +		break;
>   	default:
>   		err = -EINVAL;
>   		break;
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ