netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sfp: soft status and control support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB28008DC653496F25FC1F7A46E04E0@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:24:32 +0000
From:   Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sfp: soft status and control support

> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sfp: soft status and control support
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:51:07PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sfp: soft status and control
> > > support
> > >
> > > Add support for the soft status and control register, which allows
> > > TX_FAULT and RX_LOS to be monitored and TX_DISABLE to be set.  We
> > > make use of this when the board does not support GPIOs for these
> signals.
> >
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > With this addition, shouldn't the following print be removed?
> >
> > [    2.967583] sfp sfp-mac4: No tx_disable pin: SFP modules will always be
> emitting.
> 
> Hi Ioana
> 
> Does the SFP you are using actually support soft status?
> 
>      Andrew

Yes, it does. I am testing with a FINISAR FTLX8571D3BCL and checked its datasheet
besides verifying that the laser is actually disabled.

Ioana