[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANP3RGfF9GZ-quN-ijM4A_A+cP3-tzhA174hFjsYbXPRiTMSLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:48:49 -0800
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: inet_is_local_reserved_port() should return bool
not int
> Maciej, please repost this series with a proper introduction "[PATCH 0/3]" posting
> so that I know what this series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why
> it is doing it that way.
That's because the first two patches were standalone refactors,
and only the third - one line - patch had a dependency on the 2nd.
> That also gives me a single email to reply to when I apply your series instead of
> having to respond to each and every one, which is more work, and error prone for
> me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists