netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf, testing: add various tail call test cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbLeKYC7WJtqDkZQh6sVm4dw-aFgtUsO2Phb8DDxzaDEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:14:15 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf, testing: add various tail call test cases

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:08 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
> patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
> different programs.
>
>   # ./test_progs -n 45
>    #45/1 tailcall_1:OK
>    #45/2 tailcall_2:OK
>    #45/3 tailcall_3:OK
>    #45/4 tailcall_4:OK
>    #45/5 tailcall_5:OK
>    #45 tailcalls:OK
>   Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
> it matches expectations.
>
> Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
> call tests:
>
>   # ./test_verifier
>   [...]
>   Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> ---

LGTM. Thanks for adding more tests!

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c      | 487 ++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c |  48 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c |  59 +++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c |  31 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall4.c |  33 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall5.c |  40 ++
>  6 files changed, 698 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall4.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall5.c
>

[...]