[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191123103840.76c5d63f@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 10:38:40 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, andrew@...n.ch,
nbd@...nwrt.org, radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
john@...ozen.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [CFT PATCH net-next v2] net: phylink: rename mac_link_state()
op to mac_pcs_get_state()
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:21:37 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 07:36:44PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Russell, which of this patch or: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1197425/
> >
> > would you consider worthy of merging?
>
> Let's go with v2 for now - it gets the rename done with less risk that
> there'll be a problem. I can always do the remainder in a separate
> patch after the merge window as a separate patch.
Florian, I assume you asked because you wanted to do some testing?
Please let me know if you need more time, otherwise I'll apply this
later today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists