netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: inet_is_local_reserved_port() should return bool not int

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:31:37 -0800
From:   Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: inet_is_local_reserved_port() should return bool not int

> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:50:52 -0800, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
>
> Applied.
>
> It would had been nice to see net-next in the subject and a commit
> message, you know :/

Sorry, about that.  I'm never entirely certain what's going to
net-next, what isn't.
Should I just default to net-next?

As for the commit message, there simply didn't appear to be anything to write,
the commit title was pretty self explanatory I thought.

- Maciej