netdev - [PATCH net-next 08/15] bnxt_en: Assign more RSS context resources to the VFs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1574497570-22102-9-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:26:03 -0500
From:   Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/15] bnxt_en: Assign more RSS context resources to the VFs.

The driver currently only assignes 1 RSS context to each VF.  This works
for the Linux VF driver.  But other drivers, such as DPDK, can make use
of additional RSS contexts.  Modify the code to divide up and assign
RSS contexts to VFs just like other resources.

Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
index f6f3454..2aba1e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 	struct bnxt_pf_info *pf = &bp->pf;
 	int i, rc = 0, min = 1;
 	u16 vf_msix = 0;
+	u16 vf_rss;
 
 	bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_VF_RESOURCE_CFG, -1, -1);
 
@@ -533,9 +534,9 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 	vf_tx_rings = hw_resc->max_tx_rings - bp->tx_nr_rings;
 	vf_vnics = hw_resc->max_vnics - bp->nr_vnics;
 	vf_vnics = min_t(u16, vf_vnics, vf_rx_rings);
+	vf_rss = hw_resc->max_rsscos_ctxs - bp->rsscos_nr_ctxs;
 
 	req.min_rsscos_ctx = cpu_to_le16(BNXT_VF_MIN_RSS_CTX);
-	req.max_rsscos_ctx = cpu_to_le16(BNXT_VF_MAX_RSS_CTX);
 	if (pf->vf_resv_strategy == BNXT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MINIMAL_STATIC) {
 		min = 0;
 		req.min_rsscos_ctx = cpu_to_le16(min);
@@ -557,6 +558,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 		vf_vnics /= num_vfs;
 		vf_stat_ctx /= num_vfs;
 		vf_ring_grps /= num_vfs;
+		vf_rss /= num_vfs;
 
 		req.min_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(vf_cp_rings);
 		req.min_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(vf_tx_rings);
@@ -565,6 +567,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 		req.min_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vf_vnics);
 		req.min_stat_ctx = cpu_to_le16(vf_stat_ctx);
 		req.min_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(vf_ring_grps);
+		req.min_rsscos_ctx = cpu_to_le16(vf_rss);
 	}
 	req.max_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(vf_cp_rings);
 	req.max_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(vf_tx_rings);
@@ -573,6 +576,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 	req.max_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vf_vnics);
 	req.max_stat_ctx = cpu_to_le16(vf_stat_ctx);
 	req.max_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(vf_ring_grps);
+	req.max_rsscos_ctx = cpu_to_le16(vf_rss);
 	if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)
 		req.max_msix = cpu_to_le16(vf_msix / num_vfs);
 
@@ -598,7 +602,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
 		hw_resc->max_hw_ring_grps -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_hw_ring_grps) *
 					     n;
 		hw_resc->max_cp_rings -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_cmpl_rings) * n;
-		hw_resc->max_rsscos_ctxs -= pf->active_vfs;
+		hw_resc->max_rsscos_ctxs -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_rsscos_ctx) * n;
 		hw_resc->max_stat_ctxs -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_stat_ctx) * n;
 		hw_resc->max_vnics -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_vnics) * n;
 		if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)
-- 
2.5.1