netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf, sockmap: Return socket cookie on lookup from syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191123110751.6729-2-jakub@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:07:44 +0100
From:   Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf, sockmap: Return socket cookie on lookup from syscall

Tooling that populates the SOCKMAP with sockets from user-space needs a way
to inspect its contents. Returning the struct sock * that SOCKMAP holds to
user-space is neither safe nor useful. An approach established by
REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY is to return a socket cookie (a unique identifier)
instead.

Since socket cookies are u64 values SOCKMAP needs to support such a value
size for lookup to be possible. This requires special handling on update,
though. Attempts to do a lookup on SOCKMAP holding u32 values will be met
with ENOSPC error.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index eb114ee419b6..e8460fdc597d 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/skmsg.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/jhash.h>
+#include <linux/sock_diag.h>
 
 struct bpf_stab {
 	struct bpf_map map;
@@ -31,7 +32,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 	if (attr->max_entries == 0 ||
 	    attr->key_size    != 4 ||
-	    attr->value_size  != 4 ||
+	    (attr->value_size != sizeof(u32) &&
+	     attr->value_size != sizeof(u64)) ||
 	    attr->map_flags & ~SOCK_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
@@ -274,6 +276,23 @@ static void *sock_map_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
 }
 
+static void *sock_map_lookup_sys(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+	struct sock *sk;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+	if (map->value_size != sizeof(u64))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
+
+	sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(map, *(u32 *)key);
+	if (!sk)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	sock_gen_cookie(sk);
+	return &sk->sk_cookie;
+}
+
 static int __sock_map_delete(struct bpf_stab *stab, struct sock *sk_test,
 			     struct sock **psk)
 {
@@ -399,12 +418,19 @@ static bool sock_map_sk_is_suitable(const struct sock *sk)
 static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 				void *value, u64 flags)
 {
-	u32 ufd = *(u32 *)value;
 	u32 idx = *(u32 *)key;
 	struct socket *sock;
 	struct sock *sk;
+	u64 ufd;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (map->value_size == sizeof(u64))
+		ufd = *(u64 *)value;
+	else
+		ufd = *(u32 *)value;
+	if (ufd > S32_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	sock = sockfd_lookup(ufd, &ret);
 	if (!sock)
 		return ret;
@@ -500,6 +526,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops sock_map_ops = {
 	.map_alloc		= sock_map_alloc,
 	.map_free		= sock_map_free,
 	.map_get_next_key	= sock_map_get_next_key,
+	.map_lookup_elem_sys_only = sock_map_lookup_sys,
 	.map_update_elem	= sock_map_update_elem,
 	.map_delete_elem	= sock_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_lookup_elem	= sock_map_lookup,
-- 
2.20.1