netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for !CONFIG_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4447a335-6311-3470-7546-dff06672a200@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:27:19 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, ast@...nel.org, jakub@...udflare.com,
        andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        philip.li@...el.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add bpf_jit_blinding_enabled for
 !CONFIG_BPF_JIT

[ +Philip, +Fengguang ]

On 11/24/19 11:54 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
> [cannot apply to v5.4-rc8 next-20191122]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Borkmann/bpf-add-bpf_jit_blinding_enabled-for-CONFIG_BPF_JIT/20191125-042008
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
> reproduce:
>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>          make ARCH=i386
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>     In file included from include/net/sock.h:59:0,
>                      from include/linux/tcp.h:19,
>                      from include/linux/ipv6.h:87,
>                      from include/net/ipv6.h:12,
>                      from include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h:28,
>                      from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:32,
>                      from init/do_mounts.c:23:
>>> include/linux/filter.h:1061:20: error: redefinition of 'bpf_jit_blinding_enabled'
>      static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     include/linux/filter.h:1056:20: note: previous definition of 'bpf_jit_blinding_enabled' was here
>      static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hmm, can't reproduce with above .config for `make ARCH=i386`. The .config doesn't have
CONFIG_BPF_JIT, and given there's only exactly *one* definition of bpf_jit_blinding_enabled()
for CONFIG_BPF_JIT and *one* for !CONFIG_BPF_JIT this build bot warning feels invalid to me
(unless I'm completely blind and missing something obvious, but the succeeded kernel build
seems to agree with me).

Thanks,
Daniel

> vim +/bpf_jit_blinding_enabled +1061 include/linux/filter.h
> 
>    1060	
>> 1061	static inline bool bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>    1062	{
>    1063		return false;
>    1064	}
>    1065	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
>