netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:38 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net-next tree

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 3:58 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   84bb46cd6228 ("Revert "bpf: Emit audit messages upon successful prog load and unload"")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
>   8793e6b23b1e ("bpf: Move bpf_free_used_maps into sleepable section")
>
> from the bpf-next tree.

argh. I wonder whether individual reverts would have
helped git to avoid such conflict.
Anyhow I've rebased bpf-next on top of net-next to avoid this mess.
There was only one Fixes tag that I adjusted manually.