netdev - Re: xfrmi: request for stable trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191126081221.GA13225@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:12:21 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfrmi: request for stable trees

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 07:02:49PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:07:46 +0100
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:31:14PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >> Le 14/10/2019 à 11:31, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> >> > Le 05/09/2019 à 12:21, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> >> >> 1) Several xfrm interface fixes from Nicolas Dichtel:
> >> >>    - Avoid an interface ID corruption on changelink.
> >> >>    - Fix wrong intterface names in the logs.
> >> >>    - Fix a list corruption when changing network namespaces.
> >> >>    - Fix unregistation of the underying phydev.
> >> > Is it possible to queue those patches for the stable trees?
> >> 
> >> Is there a chance to get them in the 4.19 stable tree?
> >> 
> >> Here are the sha1:
> >> e9e7e85d75f3 ("xfrm interface: avoid corruption on changelink")
> >> e0aaa332e6a9 ("xfrm interface: ifname may be wrong in logs")
> >> c5d1030f2300 ("xfrm interface: fix list corruption for x-netns")
> >> 22d6552f827e ("xfrm interface: fix management of phydev")
> > 
> > I'm ok with this. David does the stable submitting for
> > networking patches usually. So I guess he will pick them
> > into his stable queue after the patches are mainline some
> > time.
> 
> Steffen you can submit things directly to -stable for IPSEC if you
> wish, and it would help me in this case.

Ok, can do that, no problem.
I'll submit these and do all the future IPSEC -stable submits directly.