netdev - [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:45:53 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit
 arches

Another fix I'm carrying in my perf/core branch,

Regards,

- Arnaldo

commit 98bb09f90a0ae33125fabc8f41529345382f1498
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Date:   Wed Nov 27 09:26:54 2019 -0300

    libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
    
    The st_value field is a 64-bit value, so use PRIu64 to fix this error on
    32-bit arches:
    
      In file included from libbpf.c:52:
      libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_program__record_reloc':
      libbpf_internal.h:59:22: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'Elf64_Addr' {aka 'const long long unsigned int'} [-Werror=format=]
        libbpf_print(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
                            ^~~~~~~~~~
      libbpf_internal.h:62:27: note: in expansion of macro '__pr'
       #define pr_warn(fmt, ...) __pr(LIBBPF_WARN, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
                                 ^~~~
      libbpf.c:1822:4: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_warn'
          pr_warn("bad call relo offset: %lu\n", sym->st_value);
          ^~~~~~~
      libbpf.c:1822:37: note: format string is defined here
          pr_warn("bad call relo offset: %lu\n", sym->st_value);
                                         ~~^
                                         %llu
    
    Fixes: 1f8e2bcb2cd5 ("libbpf: Refactor relocation handling")
    Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
    Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-iabs1wq19c357bkk84p7blif@git.kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b20f82e58989..6b0eae5c8a94 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ static int bpf_program__record_reloc(struct bpf_program *prog,
 			return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
 		}
 		if (sym->st_value % 8) {
-			pr_warn("bad call relo offset: %lu\n", sym->st_value);
+			pr_warn("bad call relo offset: %" PRIu64 "\n", sym->st_value);
 			return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
 		}
 		reloc_desc->type = RELO_CALL;