[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191127.105956.842685942160278820.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mst@...hat.com
Cc: jcfaracco@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dnmendes76@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next V3 0/2] drivers: net: virtio_net: implement
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:38:35 -0500
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 02:06:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> net-next is closed
>
> Could you merge this early when net-next reopens though?
> This way I don't need to keep adding drivers to update.
It simply needs to be reposted this as soon as net-next opens back up.
I fail to understand even what special treatment you want given to
a given change, it doesn't make any sense. We have a process for
doing this, it's simple, it's straightforward, and is fair to
everyone.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists