[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c71c2ef-39a4-6f38-98c0-4ee43767a725@geanix.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:52:06 +0100
From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
"mkl@...gutronix.de" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] can: flexcan: fixes for stop mode
On 27/11/2019 10.48, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> One more should confirm with you, you inserted a flexcan.ko after stop mode activated without fix patch firstly, and then inserted a flexcan.ko
> with fix patch. If yes, this could cause unbalanced pm_runtime_enabled. The reason is that firstly inserted the flexcan.ko would enable device runtime pm,
> and then you inserted flexcan.ko enable device runtime pm again.
>
> Could you please insert flexcan.ko with fix patch directly after stop mode activated?
>
Hi,
If I insert flexcan.ko with fix patch directly after stop mode
activated, the unbalanced msg is not shown...
I guess we are good then :)
/Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists