lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:06:41 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] um: vector: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 02:01:47AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Fixes: 9807019a62dc ("um: Loadable BPF "Firmware" for vector drivers")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> ---
>  arch/um/drivers/vector_kern.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/vector_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/vector_kern.c
> index 92617e16829e..6ff0065a271d 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/vector_kern.c
> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/vector_kern.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static int vector_net_load_bpf_flash(struct net_device *dev,
>  		kfree(vp->bpf->filter);
>  		vp->bpf->filter = NULL;
>  	} else {
> -		vp->bpf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sock_fprog), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		vp->bpf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sock_fprog), GFP_ATOMIC);
>  		if (vp->bpf == NULL) {
>  			netdev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory for firmware\n");
>  			goto flash_fail;
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ static int vector_net_load_bpf_flash(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (request_firmware(&fw, efl->data, &vdevice->pdev.dev))
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Is it really possible to call request_firmware() while holding a
spin_lock?  I was so sure that read from the disk.

regards,
dan carpenter

>  		goto flash_fail;
>  
> -	vp->bpf->filter = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	vp->bpf->filter = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (!vp->bpf->filter)
>  		goto free_buffer;
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ