[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191130.122742.343376576614064539.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:27:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fugang.duan@....com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net,stable 1/1] net: fec: match the dev_id between
probe and remove
From: Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 06:40:28 +0000
> Test device bind/unbind on i.MX8QM platform:
> echo 5b040000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/fec/unbind
> echo 5b040000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/fec/bind
>
> error log:
> pps pps0: new PPS source ptp0 /sys/bus/platform/drivers/fec/bind
> fec: probe of 5b040000.ethernet failed with error -2
>
> It should decrease the dev_id when device is unbinded. So let
> the fec_dev_id as global variable and let the count match in
> .probe() and .remvoe().
>
> Reported-by: shivani.patel <shivani.patel@...ansystech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
This is not correct.
Nothing says that there is a direct correlation between the devices
added and the ones removed, nor the order in which these operations
occur relative to eachother.
This dev_id allocation is buggy because you aren't using a proper
ID allocation scheme such as IDR.
I'm not applying this patch, it is incorrect and makes things
worse rather than better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists