lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <589d2715-80ae-0478-7e31-342060519320@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 1 Dec 2019 09:05:57 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux kernel - 5.4.0+ (net-next from 27.11.2019) routing/network
 performance

On 11/29/19 4:00 PM, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> As always - each year i need to summarize network performance for
> routing applications like linux router on native Linux kernel (without
> xdp/dpdk/vpp etc) :)
> 

Do you keep past profiles? How does this profile (and traffic rates)
compare to older kernels - e.g., 5.0 or 4.19?


> HW setup:
> 
> Server (Supermicro SYS-1019P-WTR)
> 
> 1x Intel 6146
> 
> 2x Mellanox connect-x 5 (100G) (installed in two different x16 pcie
> gen3.1 slots)
> 
> 6x 8GB DDR4 2666 (it really matters cause 100G is about 12.5GB/s of
> memory bandwidth one direction)
> 
> 
> And here it is:
> 
> perf top at 72Gbit.s RX and 72Gbit/s TX (at same time)
> 
>    PerfTop:   91202 irqs/sec  kernel:99.7%  exact: 100.0% [4000Hz
> cycles:ppp],  (all, 24 CPUs)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>      7.56%  [kernel]       [k] __dev_queue_xmit
>      5.27%  [kernel]       [k] build_skb
>      4.41%  [kernel]       [k] rr_transmit
>      4.17%  [kernel]       [k] fib_table_lookup
>      3.83%  [kernel]       [k] mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_mpwrq_linear
>      3.30%  [kernel]       [k] mlx5e_sq_xmit
>      3.14%  [kernel]       [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
>      2.48%  [kernel]       [k] netif_skb_features
>      2.36%  [kernel]       [k] _raw_spin_trylock
>      2.27%  [kernel]       [k] dev_hard_start_xmit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ