[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUZECPes-WxQnPo19=vehTqzW_yfJrYbuUB5bAPJEdkfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:50:45 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] Enhanced skb_mpls_pop to update ethertype of
the packet in all the cases when an ethernet header is present is the packet.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 8:57 PM Martin Varghese
<martinvarghesenokia@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:07:53PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:24 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > net-next is closed, please resubmit this when net-next opens back up.
> > >
> >
> > I think this patch is intended for -net as it fixes a bug in OVS?
> >
> > Martin, if it is the case, please resend with targeting to -net instead.
> > Also, please make the $subject shorter.
> >
> There are few upcoming features to net-next from my side which relies on this fix.
> In that case should i post against both net and net-next ?
> Please advice
If this is a bug fix, you only need to post for net. Then David will
merge net into
net-next regularly, after that you can rebase your feature patches
onto net-next.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists