[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191128024912-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:29:38 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 00/18] virtio_net XDP offload
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 03:40:14PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > For better or worse that's how userspace is written.
>
> HW offload requires modifying the user space, too. The offload is not
> transparent. Do you know that?
It's true, offload of program itself isn't transparent. Adding a 3rd
interface (software/hardware/host) isn't welcome though, IMHO.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists