netdev - Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:26:51 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel

On 2019-12-02 10:36:54 [-0500], Paul Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:48 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 2019-11-12 17:42:42 [-0500], Paul Thomas wrote:
> > > Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >
> > Could please enable CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and check if the kernel
> > complains?
> 
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> Well, it does complain (report below), but I'm not sure it's related.
> The other thing I tried was the AF_XDP example here:
> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tutorial/tree/master/advanced03-AF_XDP
> 
> With this example poll() always seems to block correctly, so I think
> maybe there is something wrong with the xdpsock_user.c example or how
> I'm using it.
> 
> [  259.591480] BUG: assuming atomic context at net/core/ptp_classifier.c:106
> [  259.591488] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 953, name: irq/22-eth%d
> [  259.591494] CPU: 0 PID: 953 Comm: irq/22-eth%d Tainted: G        WC
>        5.
> 
>                         2.21-rt13-00016-g93898e751d0e #90
> [  259.591499] Hardware name: Enclustra XU5 SOM (DT)
> [  259.591501] Call trace:
> [  259.591503] dump_backtrace (/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:94)
> [  259.591514] show_stack (/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:151)
> [  259.591520] dump_stack (/lib/dump_stack.c:115)
> [  259.591526] __cant_sleep (/kernel/sched/core.c:6386)
> [  259.591531] ptp_classify_raw (/./include/linux/compiler.h:194

Is this the only splat? Nothing more? I would expect something at boot
time, too.

So this part expects disabled preemption. Other invocations disable
preemption. The whole BPF part is currently not working on -RT.

Sebastian