netdev - Re: [PATCH net] tcp: refactor tcp_retransmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191203202328.GA3183510@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 21:23:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: refactor tcp_retransmit_timer()

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:30:29AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:22 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:15:31AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:13 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:05:52AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > > It appears linux-4.14 stable needs a backport of commit
> > > > > 88f8598d0a30 ("tcp: exit if nothing to retransmit on RTO timeout")
> > > > >
> > > > > Since tcp_rtx_queue_empty() is not in pre 4.15 kernels,
> > > > > let's refactor tcp_retransmit_timer() to only use tcp_rtx_queue_head()
> > > >
> > > > So does that mean that 4.19.y should get 88f8598d0a30 ("tcp: exit if
> > > > nothing to retransmit on RTO timeout") as-is?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes indeed. All stable versions need it.
> >
> > So 4.4.y and 4.9.y as well?
> 
> They should be fine, since they do not have yet :
> 
> ba2ddb43f270e6492ccce4fc42fc32c611de8f68 tcp: Don't dequeue
> SYN/FIN-segments from write-queue
> f1dcc5ed4bea3f2d63b74ad86617ec12b1e5e9d4 tcp: Reset send_head when
> removing skb from write-queue
> 8e6521f6404e704fac313ab2479923be1f741f73 tcp: remove empty skb from
> write queue in error cases
> 
> I would leave them untouched, to limit further problems :/

Great, thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h