netdev - [PATCH V2] can: xilinx_can: Fix missing Rx can packets on CANFD2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1575375396-3403-1-git-send-email-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
Date:   Tue,  3 Dec 2019 17:46:36 +0530
From:   Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
To:     wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
        michal.simek@...inx.com, appanad@...inx.com
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        git@...inx.com, nagasure@...inx.com,
        Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] can: xilinx_can: Fix missing Rx can packets on CANFD2.0

CANFD2.0 core uses BRAM for storing acceptance filter ID(AFID) and MASK
(AFMASK)registers. So by default AFID and AFMASK registers contain random
data. Due to random data, we are not able to receive all CAN ids.

Initializing AFID and AFMASK registers with Zero before enabling
acceptance filter to receive all packets irrespective of ID and Mask.

Fixes: 0db9071353a0 ("can: xilinx: add can 2.0 support")
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
index 464af939cd8a..c1dbab8c896d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ enum xcan_reg {
 	XCAN_TXMSG_BASE_OFFSET	= 0x0100, /* TX Message Space */
 	XCAN_RXMSG_BASE_OFFSET	= 0x1100, /* RX Message Space */
 	XCAN_RXMSG_2_BASE_OFFSET	= 0x2100, /* RX Message Space */
+	XCAN_AFR_2_MASK_OFFSET	= 0x0A00, /* Acceptance Filter MASK */
+	XCAN_AFR_2_ID_OFFSET	= 0x0A04, /* Acceptance Filter ID */
 };
 
 #define XCAN_FRAME_ID_OFFSET(frame_base)	((frame_base) + 0x00)
@@ -1809,6 +1811,11 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
 
+	if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2) {
+		priv->write_reg(priv, XCAN_AFR_2_ID_OFFSET, 0x00000000);
+		priv->write_reg(priv, XCAN_AFR_2_MASK_OFFSET, 0x00000000);
+	}
+
 	netdev_dbg(ndev, "reg_base=0x%p irq=%d clock=%d, tx buffers: actual %d, using %d\n",
 		   priv->reg_base, ndev->irq, priv->can.clock.freq,
 		   hw_tx_max, priv->tx_max);
-- 
2.7.4