netdev - Re: xfrmi: request for stable trees (was: Re: pull request (net): ipsec 2019-09-05)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191203130345.GC8621@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:03:45 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfrmi: request for stable trees (was: Re: pull request (net):
 ipsec 2019-09-05)

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:31:14PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 14/10/2019 à 11:31, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> > Le 05/09/2019 à 12:21, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> >> 1) Several xfrm interface fixes from Nicolas Dichtel:
> >>    - Avoid an interface ID corruption on changelink.
> >>    - Fix wrong intterface names in the logs.
> >>    - Fix a list corruption when changing network namespaces.
> >>    - Fix unregistation of the underying phydev.
> > Is it possible to queue those patches for the stable trees?
> 
> Is there a chance to get them in the 4.19 stable tree?
> 
> Here are the sha1:
> e9e7e85d75f3 ("xfrm interface: avoid corruption on changelink")
> e0aaa332e6a9 ("xfrm interface: ifname may be wrong in logs")
> c5d1030f2300 ("xfrm interface: fix list corruption for x-netns")
> 22d6552f827e ("xfrm interface: fix management of phydev")

Nicolas,

I'm currently processing the stable queue for v4.19.
I guess we also need this patch from you:

56c5ee1a5823 ("xfrm interface: fix memory leak on creation")

before we apply the above mentioned patches, right?