netdev - Re: [PATCH net] Fixed updating of ethertype in function skb_mpls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191204.123218.1796332582453267563.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     martinvarghesenokia@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, pshelar@....org, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Fixed updating of ethertype in function
 skb_mpls_push


The proper format for a patch Subject line is:

[PATCH $TARGET_GIT_TREE $VERSION] $subsystem_prefix: Description.

So for your updated submission of this patch you could say:

[PATCH net v2] mpls: Fix updating of ethertype in skb_mpls_push()

or:

[PATCH net v2] net: Fix updating of ethertype in skb_mpls_push()

Either would be fine.