[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbb92429-7242-3716-0f53-35e6b83aeeb2@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:32:17 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
<yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: hns3: fix for TX queue not restarted problem
On 2019/12/3 16:48, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 12:28:22 +0800
>
>> On 2019/12/3 11:25, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:08:53 +0800
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
>>>> index ba05368..b2bb8e2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
>>>> @@ -1286,13 +1286,16 @@ static bool hns3_skb_need_linearized(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *bd_size,
>>>> return false;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static int hns3_nic_maybe_stop_tx(struct hns3_enet_ring *ring,
>>>> +static int hns3_nic_maybe_stop_tx(struct net_device *netdev,
>>>> struct sk_buff **out_skb)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>> unsigned int bd_size[HNS3_MAX_TSO_BD_NUM + 1U];
>>>> struct sk_buff *skb = *out_skb;
>>>> + struct hns3_enet_ring *ring;
>>>> unsigned int bd_num;
>>>>
>>>> + ring = &priv->ring[skb->queue_mapping];
>>>
>>> Please just pass the ring pointer into hns3_nic_maybe_stop_tx() instead of
>>> needlessly recalculating it.
>>
>> The reason that I am passing the netdev instead of ring pointer is
>> that the netif_start_subqueue() need a netdev parameter, and the
>> netdev can not be derived from the ring pointer.
>>
>> Do you think it is better to keep it as this patch, or add a new
>> netdevice parameter? like below:
>
> Just add the netdev parameter, in addition to the ring parameter.
>
> All arguments fit in the register argument passing conventions of
> various cpus so the cost of adding the parameter is zero.
Ok, thanks.
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists