lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:03:31 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> To: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "saeedm@...lanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com> Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] page_pool: mark unbound node page as reusable pages On 2019/12/5 10:47, Li,Rongqing wrote: >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1125789/ > > > What is status of this patch? I think you should fix your firmware or bios Have not reached a conclusion yet. > > Consider the below condition: > > there is two numa node, and NIC sites on node 2, but NUMA_NO_NODE is used, recycle will fail due to page_to_nid(page) == numa_mem_id(), > and reallocated pages maybe always from node 1, then the recycle will never success. For page pool: 1. if the pool->p.nid != NUMA_NO_NODE, the recycle is always decided by checking page_to_nid(page) == pool->p.nid. 2. only when the pool->p.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE, the numa_mem_id() is checked to decide the recycle. Yes, If pool->p.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE, and the cpu that is doing recycling is changing each time, the recycle may never success, but it is not common, and have its own performance penalty when changing the recycling cpu so often. > > -RongQing > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists