lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191206212746.GA30691@krava>
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 22:27:46 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] bpf: Emit audit messages upon successful prog load and
 unload

On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:11:13PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:

SNIP

> >
> >  #define IS_FD_ARRAY(map) ((map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY || \
> > @@ -1306,6 +1307,36 @@ static int find_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type type, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +enum bpf_audit {
> > +       BPF_AUDIT_LOAD,
> > +       BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD,
> > +       BPF_AUDIT_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const bpf_audit_str[BPF_AUDIT_MAX] = {
> > +       [BPF_AUDIT_LOAD]   = "LOAD",
> > +       [BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD] = "UNLOAD",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void bpf_audit_prog(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned int op)
> > +{
> > +       struct audit_context *ctx = NULL;
> > +       struct audit_buffer *ab;
> > +
> > +       if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_OFF)
> > +               return;
> > +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(op >= BPF_AUDIT_MAX))
> > +               return;
> 
> I feel bad saying this given the number of revisions we are at with
> this patch, but since we aren't even at -rc1 yet (although it will be
> here soon), I'm going to mention it anyway ;)
> 
> ... if we move the "op >= BPF_AUDIT_MAX" above the audit_enabled check
> we will catch problems sooner in development, which is a very good
> thing as far as I'm concerned.

sure, np will post v3

> 
> Other than that, this looks good to me, and I see Steve has already
> given the userspace portion a thumbs-up.  Have you started on the
> audit-testsuite test for this yet?

yep, it's ready.. waiting for kernel change ;-)
https://github.com/olsajiri/audit-testsuite/commit/16888ea7f14fa0269feef623d2a96f15f9ea71c9

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ