lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNU0TD+ckuf9XnoRAq3mKjLARYbq8CCgCUM4BfRY33pEmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:51:03 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc:     Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
        Ariel Levkovich <lariel@...lanox.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mlx5 support tc accept action

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:30 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:41 PM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roi, Saeed
> > In one cause, we want the "accept" action: the IP of VF will be
> > "accept", and others
> > packets will be done with other actions(e.g. hairpin rule to other VF).
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > PF0=enp130s0f0
> > VF0_REP=enp130s0f0_0
> > VF0=p4p1_0
> > VF1=p4p2_0 # belong to PF1
> > VF0_IP=3.3.3.200
> >
> > ethtool -K $PF0 hw-tc-offload on
> > ethtool -K $VF0 hw-tc-offload on
> > tc qdisc add dev $PF0 ingress
> > tc qdisc add dev $VF0 ingress
> > tc filter add dev $PF0 protocol all parent ffff: prio 10 handle 1
> > flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev $VF0_REP
> > tc filter add dev $VF0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 handle 3 flower
> > skip_sw dst_ip $VF0_IP action pass
> > tc filter add dev $VF0 protocol all parent ffff: prio 10 handle 2
> > flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev $VF1
> >
> > When I change the driver, the rule which action "action pass", can be
> > offloaded, but it didn't work.
> > +               case FLOW_ACTION_ACCEPT:
> > +                   action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ALLOW;
> > +                   break;
> >
> >
> > How can we support it, this function is import for us.
>
> Hi Tonghao,
> where did you add the above code to ?
> parse_tc_fdb_actions() ? or parse_tc_nic_actions() ?
> in your use case you need to add it to parse_tc_nic_actions(),
>
> currently in mlx5 we don't support ALLOW/pass actions.
> it might be a little more complicated than what you did in order to
> support this,
> as a work around you can use action: FLOW_ACTION_MARK in the tc
> command line rule without any change in the driver.
> or change your code to do MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST instead of
> MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ALLOW
Hi Saeed, FLOW_ACTION_MARK works fine for us. Thanks.

> Adding Mark and Ariel, they might have better feedback than mine
>
> Thanks,
> Saeed/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ