[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191208.224112.2234468529480733416.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 22:41:12 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ms@....tdt.de
Cc: andrew.hendry@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
linux-x25@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/x25: add new state X25_STATE_5
From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 06:28:53 +0100
> On 2019-12-07 20:59, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
>> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:18 +0100
>>
>>> + switch (frametype) {
>>> +
>>> + case X25_CLEAR_REQUEST:
>> Please remove this unnecessary empty line.
>>
>>> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, X25_STD_MIN_LEN + 2))
>>> + goto out_clear;
>> A goto path for a single call site? Just inline the operations here.
>
> Well, I was guided by the code style of the other states.
> I could add a patch to also clean up the other states.
> What do you think?
Leave the other states and existing code alone.
Make your new code reasonable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists