lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191209225344.99740-27-jhubbard@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 14:53:44 -0800 From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> Subject: [PATCH v8 26/26] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL_PIN coverage It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite is going to cause no noticeable change in running time. So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests: 1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages(). 2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN. Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual comparison of the running times, which is convenient. The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script, because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests index a692ea828317..df6a6bf3f238 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests @@ -112,6 +112,28 @@ echo "NOTE: The above hugetlb tests provide minimal coverage. Use" echo " https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs.git for" echo " hugetlb regression testing." +echo "--------------------------------------------" +echo "running 'gup_benchmark -U' (normal/slow gup)" +echo "--------------------------------------------" +./gup_benchmark -U +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "[FAIL]" + exitcode=1 +else + echo "[PASS]" +fi + +echo "------------------------------------------" +echo "running gup_benchmark -b (pin_user_pages)" +echo "------------------------------------------" +./gup_benchmark -b +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "[FAIL]" + exitcode=1 +else + echo "[PASS]" +fi + echo "-------------------" echo "running userfaultfd" echo "-------------------" -- 2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists