netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] bpf: start using the BPF dispatcher in BPF_TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191209135522.16576-5-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 Dec 2019 14:55:20 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@...il.com,
        magnus.karlsson@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
        ecree@...arflare.com, thoiland@...hat.com,
        andrii.nakryiko@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] bpf: start using the BPF dispatcher in BPF_TEST_RUN

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>

In order to properly exercise the BPF dispatcher, this commit adds BPF
dispatcher usage to BPF_TEST_RUN when executing XDP programs.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 915c2d6f7fb9..400f473c2541 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 #include <trace/events/bpf_test_run.h>
 
 static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
-			u32 *retval, u32 *time)
+			u32 *retval, u32 *time, bool xdp)
 {
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = { NULL };
 	enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
@@ -41,7 +41,11 @@ static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
 	time_start = ktime_get_ns();
 	for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
 		bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage);
-		*retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
+
+		if (xdp)
+			*retval = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, ctx);
+		else
+			*retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
 
 		if (signal_pending(current)) {
 			ret = -EINTR;
@@ -359,7 +363,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
-	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration);
+	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 	if (!is_l2) {
@@ -416,8 +420,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 
 	rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
 	xdp.rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq;
-
-	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &retval, &duration);
+	bpf_prog_change_xdp(NULL, prog);
+	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &retval, &duration, true);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 	if (xdp.data != data + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN ||
@@ -425,6 +429,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		size = xdp.data_end - xdp.data;
 	ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, xdp.data, size, retval, duration);
 out:
+	bpf_prog_change_xdp(prog, NULL);
 	kfree(data);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.20.1