netdev - 答复: [PATCH][v2] page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb3c3846334744d7bbe83b1a29eaa762@baidu.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:39:14 +0000
From:   "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To:     Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>
CC:     "ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        "jonathan.lemon@...il.com" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][v2] page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO_NODE condition

> 
> static int mvneta_create_page_pool(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> 				   struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, int size) {
> 	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(pp->xdp_prog);
> 	struct page_pool_params pp_params = {
> 		.order = 0,
> 		.flags = PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP | PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV,
> 		.pool_size = size,
> 		.nid = cpu_to_node(0),

This kind of device should only be installed to vendor's platform which did not support numa

But as you say , Saeed advice maybe cause that recycle always fail, if nid is configured like upper, and different from running NAPI node id

And maybe we can catch this case by the below

diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 3c8b51ccd1c1..973235c09487 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -328,6 +328,11 @@ static bool pool_page_reusable(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
 void __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
                          unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool allow_direct)
 {
+       allow_direct = allow_direct && in_serving_softirq();
+
+       if (allow_direct)
+               WARN_ON_ONCE((pool->p.nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) &&
+                                    (pool->p.nid != numa_mem_id()));
        /* This allocator is optimized for the XDP mode that uses
         * one-frame-per-page, but have fallbacks that act like the
         * regular page allocator APIs.
@@ -342,7 +347,7 @@ void __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
                        page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page,
                                                      dma_sync_size);
 
-               if (allow_direct && in_serving_softirq())
+               if (allow_direct)
                        if (__page_pool_recycle_direct(page, pool))
                                return;


-Li

> 		.dev = pp->dev->dev.parent,
> 		.dma_dir = xdp_prog ? DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL : DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> 		.offset = pp->rx_offset_correction,
> 		.max_len = MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE,
> 	};
> 
> the pool->p.nid is not NUMA_NO_NODE, then the node of page allocated for rx
> may not be numa_mem_id() when running in the NAPI polling, because
> pool->p.nid is not the same as the node of cpu running in the NAPI polling.
> 
> Does the page pool support recycling for above case?
> 
> Or we "fix' the above case by setting pool->p.nid to
> NUMA_NO_NODE/dev_to_node(), or by calling pool_update_nid() in NAPI
> polling as mlx5 does?
> 
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Saeed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >