[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4903CBE2-8A70-4B47-ABB2-A884C99E3ABF@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:28:17 +0000
From: "Belgazal, Netanel" <netanel@...zon.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"Machulsky, Zorik" <zorik@...zon.com>,
"Matushevsky, Alexander" <matua@...zon.com>,
"Bshara, Saeed" <saeedb@...zon.com>,
"Wilson, Matt" <msw@...zon.com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
"Bshara, Nafea" <nafea@...zon.com>,
"Tzalik, Guy" <gtzalik@...zon.com>,
"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
"Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" <benh@...zon.com>,
"Kiyanovski, Arthur" <akiyano@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 net] net: ena: fix napi handler misbehavior when the
napi budget is zero
I just did it.
Regards,
Netanel
On 12/9/19, 8:35 PM, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
From: Netanel Belgazal <netanel@...zon.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 17:30:26 +0000
> In netpoll the napi handler could be called with budget equal to zero.
> Current ENA napi handler doesn't take that into consideration.
>
> The napi handler handles Rx packets in a do-while loop.
> Currently, the budget check happens only after decrementing the
> budget, therefore the napi handler, in rare cases, could run over
> MAX_INT packets.
>
> In addition to that, this moves all budget related variables to int
> calculation and stop mixing u32 to avoid ambiguity
>
> Signed-off-by: Netanel Belgazal <netanel@...zon.com>
Bug fixes need to have an appropriate Fixes: tag.
Please repost with that added, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists