lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOrHB_BSi57EwqQ6RWzK55-ADhT_z4_fyMVrGacMMO-BXFoREA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:22:56 -0800
From:   Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
To:     Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, scott.drennan@...ia.com,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        "Varghese, Martin (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] openvswitch: New MPLS actions for layer 2 tunnelling

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:17 AM Martin Varghese
<martinvarghesenokia@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
>
> The existing PUSH MPLS & POP MPLS actions inserts & removes MPLS header
> between ethernet header and the IP header. Though this behaviour is fine
> for L3 VPN where an IP packet is encapsulated inside a MPLS tunnel, it
> does not suffice the L2 VPN (l2 tunnelling) requirements. In L2 VPN
> the MPLS header should encapsulate the ethernet packet.
>
> The new mpls actions PTAP_PUSH_MPLS & PTAP_POP_MPLS inserts and removes
> MPLS header from start of the packet respectively.
>
> PTAP_PUSH_MPLS - Inserts MPLS header at the start of the packet.
> @ethertype - Ethertype of MPLS header.
>
> PTAP_POP_MPLS - Removes MPLS header from the start of the packet.
> @ethertype - Ethertype of next header following the popped MPLS header.
>              Value 0 in ethertype indicates the tunnelled packet is
>              ethernet.
>
Did you considered using existing MPLS action to handle L2 tunneling
packet ? It can be done by adding another parameter to the MPLS
actions.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ