[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191209.201419.1322197127670226216.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 20:14:19 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: get netns from asoc and ep base
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:03:17 +0800
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:14 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:45:18 +0800
>>
>> > Commit 312434617cb1 ("sctp: cache netns in sctp_ep_common") set netns
>> > in asoc and ep base since they're created, and it will never change.
>> > It's a better way to get netns from asoc and ep base, comparing to
>> > calling sock_net().
>> >
>> > This patch is to replace them.
>> >
>> > v1->v2:
>> > - no change.
>> >
>> > Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>> > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
>>
>> This looks like a cleanup rather than a bug fix, so net-next right?
> Yes, a cleanup, and net-next should be better.
Great, applied to net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists