[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210073326.GA3077639@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:33:26 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com,
sassmann@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, parav@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 00/20][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates
2019-12-09
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:49:15PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> This series contains the initial implementation of the Virtual Bus,
> virtbus_device, virtbus_driver, updates to 'ice' and 'i40e' to use the new
> Virtual Bus and the new RDMA driver 'irdma' for use with 'ice' and 'i40e'.
>
> The primary purpose of the Virtual bus is to provide a matching service
> and to pass the data pointer contained in the virtbus_device to the
> virtbus_driver during its probe call. This will allow two separate
> kernel objects to match up and start communication.
>
> The last 16 patches of the series adds a unified Intel Ethernet Protocol
> driver for RDMA that supports a new network device E810 (iWARP and
> RoCEv2 capable) and the existing X722 iWARP device. The driver
> architecture provides the extensibility for future generations of Intel
> hardware supporting RDMA.
>
> The 'irdma' driver replaces the legacy X722 driver i40iw and extends the
> ABI already defined for i40iw. It is backward compatible with legacy
> X722 rdma-core provider (libi40iw).
>
> This series currently builds against net-next tree AND the rdma "for-next"
> branch.
>
> v1: Initial virtual bus submission
> v2: Added example virtbus_dev and virtbus_drv in
> tools/testing/sefltests/ to test the virtual bus and provide an
> example on how to implement
> v3: Added ice and i40e driver changes to implement the virtual bus, also
> added the new irdma driver which is the RDMA driver which
> communicates with the ice and i40e drivers
Seems pretty premature to ask for a pull request after I rejected your
first 2 submissions and have not seen a valid implementation yet.
Please give me a few days to review this...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists