lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:33:02 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        lkml <>,,, Martin Lau <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:20:11PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Daniel Borkmann <> writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:55PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
> >> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
> >> this?), or should I resend?
> >
> > Fixes tags should /always/ be present if possible, since they help to provide
> > more context even if the buggy commit was in bpf-next, for example.
> ACK, will do. Thank you for picking them up for this patch (did you do
> that manually, or is this part of your scripts?)

Manually right now, but if you have some cycles, happy to pick up a patch [0]. :)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists