netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/mlx5e: add mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a96ffa33-e680-d92c-3c5c-f86b7b9e12bb@ucloud.cn>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:41:29 +0800
From:   wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        "pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/mlx5e: add mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb
 support


On 12/10/2019 7:44 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> On 12/10/2019 12:08 PM, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>>
>> Add mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb to support indr block setup
>> in FT mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
>> index 6f304f6..e0da17c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
>> @@ -748,6 +748,40 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_tc_cb(enum tc_setup_type type,
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb(enum tc_setup_type type,
>> +				      void *type_data, void *indr_priv)
>> +{
>> +	struct mlx5e_rep_indr_block_priv *priv = indr_priv;
>> +	struct mlx5e_priv *mpriv = netdev_priv(priv->rpriv->netdev);
>> +	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = mpriv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
>> +	struct flow_cls_offload *f = type_data;
>> +	struct flow_cls_offload cls_flower;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	flags = MLX5_TC_FLAG(EGRESS) |
>> +		MLX5_TC_FLAG(ESW_OFFLOAD) |
>> +		MLX5_TC_FLAG(FT_OFFLOAD);
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER:
>> +		if (!mlx5_eswitch_prios_supported(esw) || f->common.chain_index)
>> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +		/* Re-use tc offload path by moving the ft flow to the
>> +		 * reserved ft chain.
>> +		 */
>> +		memcpy(&cls_flower, f, sizeof(*f));
>> +		cls_flower.common.chain_index = FDB_FT_CHAIN;
>> +		err = mlx5e_rep_indr_offload(priv->netdev, &cls_flower, priv,
>> +					     flags);
>> +		memcpy(&f->stats, &cls_flower.stats, sizeof(f->stats));
>> +		return err;
>> +	default:
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void mlx5e_rep_indr_block_unbind(void *cb_priv)
>>   {
>>   	struct mlx5e_rep_indr_block_priv *indr_priv = cb_priv;
>> @@ -825,6 +859,9 @@ int mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_cb(struct net_device *netdev, void *cb_priv,
>>   	case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
>>   		return mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block(netdev, cb_priv, type_data,
>>   						  mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_tc_cb);
>> +	case TC_SETUP_FT:
>> +		return mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_block(netdev, cb_priv, type_data,
>> +						  mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb);
>>   	default:
>>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   	}
>
> +cc Saeed
>
>
> This looks good to me, but it should be on top of a patch that will 
> actual allows the indirect BIND if the nft
>
> table device is a tunnel device. Is that upstream? If so which patch?
>
>
> Currently (5.5.0-rc1+), nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks calls 
> nf_flow_table_offload_setup which will see
>
> that the tunnel device doesn't have ndo_setup_tc and return 
> -EOPNOTSUPPORTED.

The related patch  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1206935/

is waiting for upstream


>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul.
>
>
>