netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 10/25] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages*() and FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:57:37 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Björn Töpel 
        <bjorn.topel@...el.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/25] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages*() and
 FOLL_PIN

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:53:03 -0800
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:

> Introduce pin_user_pages*() variations of get_user_pages*() calls,
> and also pin_longterm_pages*() variations.

Just a couple of nits on the documentation patch

> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +====================================================
> +pin_user_pages() and related calls
> +====================================================
> +
> +.. contents:: :local:
> +
> +Overview
> +========
> +
> +This document describes the following functions: ::
> +
> + pin_user_pages
> + pin_user_pages_fast
> + pin_user_pages_remote

You could just say "the following functions::" and get the result you're
after with a slightly less alien plain-text reading experience.

Of course, you could also just say "This document describes
pin_user_pages(), pin_user_pages_fast(), and pin_user_pages_remote()." But
that's a matter of personal taste, I guess.  Using the function() notation
will cause the docs system to automatically link to the kerneldoc info,
though.  

> +Basic description of FOLL_PIN
> +=============================
> +
> +FOLL_PIN and FOLL_LONGTERM are flags that can be passed to the get_user_pages*()
> +("gup") family of functions. FOLL_PIN has significant interactions and
> +interdependencies with FOLL_LONGTERM, so both are covered here.
> +
> +FOLL_PIN is internal to gup, meaning that it should not appear at the gup call
> +sites. This allows the associated wrapper functions  (pin_user_pages*() and
> +others) to set the correct combination of these flags, and to check for problems
> +as well.
> +
> +FOLL_LONGTERM, on the other hand, *is* allowed to be set at the gup call sites.
> +This is in order to avoid creating a large number of wrapper functions to cover
> +all combinations of get*(), pin*(), FOLL_LONGTERM, and more. Also, the
> +pin_user_pages*() APIs are clearly distinct from the get_user_pages*() APIs, so
> +that's a natural dividing line, and a good point to make separate wrapper calls.
> +In other words, use pin_user_pages*() for DMA-pinned pages, and
> +get_user_pages*() for other cases. There are four cases described later on in
> +this document, to further clarify that concept.
> +
> +FOLL_PIN and FOLL_GET are mutually exclusive for a given gup call. However,
> +multiple threads and call sites are free to pin the same struct pages, via both
> +FOLL_PIN and FOLL_GET. It's just the call site that needs to choose one or the
> +other, not the struct page(s).
> +
> +The FOLL_PIN implementation is nearly the same as FOLL_GET, except that FOLL_PIN
> +uses a different reference counting technique.
> +
> +FOLL_PIN is a prerequisite to FOLL_LONGTGERM. Another way of saying that is,

FOLL_LONGTERM typoed there.

Thanks,

jon