[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:55:52 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlwifi warnings in 5.5-rc1
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 15:55 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 15:09 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> > > If we're doing this on a per-driver basis, let's make it a proper
>> > > NL80211_EXT_FEATURE and expose it to userspace; that way users can at
>> > > least discover if it's supported on their device. I can send a patch
>> > > adding that...
>> >
>> > Sure. Just didn't get to that yet, but if you want to send a patch
>> > that's very welcome. I have to run out now, will be back in the evening
>> > at most.
>>
>> Patch here (for those not following linux-wireless):
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=215107
>
> Thanks!
>
> Maybe I should roll that into a single patch so it's actually easier to
> apply as a bugfix while keeping ath10k on AQL for 5.5, otherwise it
> could be argued that the ath10k patch is a feature for -next ...
Yeah, good point. Since it seems I'm sending a v2 anyway, I'll combine
the two for that...
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists