lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191212184732.GA570918@splinter> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:47:32 +0200 From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> Cc: Yuval Avnery <yuvalav@...lanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netdevsim: Add max_vfs to bus_dev On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:25:17AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > I'd like to see netdevsim to also serve as sort of a reference model > for device behaviour. Vendors who are not first to implement a feature > always complain that there is no documentation on how things should > work. +1 I have a patch set that adds FIB offload implementation to netdevsim and a gazillion of test cases that I share between netdevsim and mlxsw. Can be used by more drivers when they land. It's also very convenient for fuzzing now that syzkaller supports netdevsim instances thanks to Jiri. I've been running syzkaller for a few weeks now to test the FIB implementation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists