[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191213162808.GB26710@kwain>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:28:08 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: mvpp2: update mvpp2 validate()
implementation
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 04:11:44PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 05:43:46PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > > index 111b3b8239e1..fddd856338b4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > > @@ -4786,6 +4786,8 @@ static void mvpp2_phylink_validate(struct phylink_config *config,
> > > phylink_set(mask, 10000baseER_Full);
> > > phylink_set(mask, 10000baseKR_Full);
> > > }
> > > + if (state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA)
> > > + break;
> >
> > > /* Fall-through */
> > > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> > > @@ -4796,13 +4798,21 @@ static void mvpp2_phylink_validate(struct phylink_config *config,
> > > phylink_set(mask, 10baseT_Full);
> > > phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Half);
> > > phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Full);
> > > + if (state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA)
> > > + break;
> >
> > The two checks above will break the 10G/1G interfaces on the mcbin
> > (eth0/eth1) as they can support both 10gbase-kr and 10/100/1000baseT
> > modes depending on what's connected. With this patch only the modes
> > related to the one defined in the device tree would be valid, breaking
> > run-time reconfiguration of the link.
>
> Exactly which scenario are you talking about? The mcbin doubleshot
> setup, or the singleshot setup?
I was thinking about the doubleshot.
> This patch (when combined with the others) has no effect on the
> doubleshot, and should have no effect on the SFP cages on the single
> shot.
You're right, I just tested the series and it the two 10G/1G ports were
able to be reconfigured at runtime, my bad.
However it seems cp1_eth1 is coming up at 100Mbps only. (I haven't
looked into it more than a quick test so far).
# ethtool eth2
Settings for eth2:
Supported ports: [ TP MII FIBRE ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Supported FEC modes: Not reported
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Link partner advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Speed: 100Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: MII
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
Link detected: yes
The link partner however advertises:
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists