lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba15746b-2cd8-5a04-08fa-3c85b94db15b@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:46:01 +0000
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
        Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/11] bpf: add generic_batch_ops to lpm_trie
 map



On 12/11/19 2:33 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> This adds the generic batch ops functionality to bpf lpm_trie.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> index 56e6c75d354d9..92c47b4f03337 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> @@ -743,4 +743,8 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops trie_map_ops = {
>   	.map_update_elem = trie_update_elem,
>   	.map_delete_elem = trie_delete_elem,
>   	.map_check_btf = trie_check_btf,
> +	.map_lookup_batch = generic_map_lookup_batch,
> +	.map_lookup_and_delete_batch = generic_map_lookup_and_delete_batch,

Not 100% sure whether trie should use generic map
lookup/lookup_and_delete or not. If the key is not available,
the get_next_key will return the 'leftmost' node which roughly
corresponding to the first node in the hash table.

> +	.map_delete_batch = generic_map_delete_batch,
> +	.map_update_batch = generic_map_update_batch,
>   };
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ