lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63329cd7-4d3a-9497-e5ed-6995f05cd81f@mellanox.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:04:08 +0000
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        "bjorn.topel@...el.com" <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jonathan.lemon@...il.com" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
CC:     "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        "maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com" <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] xsk: consolidate to one single cached
 producer pointer

On 2019-12-09 09:56, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> Currently, the xsk ring code has two cached producer pointers:
> prod_head and prod_tail. This patch consolidates these two into a
> single one called cached_prod to make the code simpler and easier to
> maintain. This will be in line with the user space part of the the
> code found in libbpf, that only uses a single cached pointer.
> 
> The Rx path only uses the two top level functions
> xskq_produce_batch_desc and xskq_produce_flush_desc and they both use
> prod_head and never prod_tail. So just move them over to
> cached_prod.
> 
> The Tx XDP_DRV path uses xskq_produce_addr_lazy and
> xskq_produce_flush_addr_n and unnecessarily operates on both prod_tail
> and prod_cons, so move them over to just use cached_prod by skipping
> the intermediate step of updating prod_tail.
> 
> The Tx path in XDP_SKB mode uses xskq_reserve_addr and
> xskq_produce_addr. They currently use both cached pointers, but we can
> operate on the global producer pointer in xskq_produce_addr since it
> has to be updated anyway, thus eliminating the use of both cached
> pointers. We can also remove the xskq_nb_free in xskq_produce_addr
> since it is already called in xskq_reserve_addr. No need to do it
> twice.
> 
> When there is only one cached producer pointer, we can also simplify
> xskq_nb_free by removing one argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> ---
>   net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index a2f0ba6..d88e1a0 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ struct xsk_queue {
>   	u64 size;
>   	u32 ring_mask;
>   	u32 nentries;
> -	u32 prod_head;
> -	u32 prod_tail;
> +	u32 cached_prod;
>   	u32 cons_head;
>   	u32 cons_tail;
>   	struct xdp_ring *ring;
> @@ -94,39 +93,39 @@ static inline u64 xskq_nb_invalid_descs(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   
>   static inline u32 xskq_nb_avail(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 dcnt)
>   {
> -	u32 entries = q->prod_tail - q->cons_tail;
> +	u32 entries = q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail;
>   
>   	if (entries == 0) {
>   		/* Refresh the local pointer */
> -		q->prod_tail = READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer);
> -		entries = q->prod_tail - q->cons_tail;
> +		q->cached_prod = READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer);
> +		entries = q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail;
>   	}
>   
>   	return (entries > dcnt) ? dcnt : entries;
>   }
>   
> -static inline u32 xskq_nb_free(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 producer, u32 dcnt)
> +static inline u32 xskq_nb_free(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 dcnt)
>   {
> -	u32 free_entries = q->nentries - (producer - q->cons_tail);
> +	u32 free_entries = q->nentries - (q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail);
>   
>   	if (free_entries >= dcnt)
>   		return free_entries;
>   
>   	/* Refresh the local tail pointer */
>   	q->cons_tail = READ_ONCE(q->ring->consumer);
> -	return q->nentries - (producer - q->cons_tail);
> +	return q->nentries - (q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail);
>   }
>   
>   static inline bool xskq_has_addrs(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 cnt)
>   {
> -	u32 entries = q->prod_tail - q->cons_tail;
> +	u32 entries = q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail;
>   
>   	if (entries >= cnt)
>   		return true;
>   
>   	/* Refresh the local pointer. */
> -	q->prod_tail = READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer);
> -	entries = q->prod_tail - q->cons_tail;
> +	q->cached_prod = READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer);
> +	entries = q->cached_prod - q->cons_tail;
>   
>   	return entries >= cnt;
>   }
> @@ -220,17 +219,15 @@ static inline void xskq_discard_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   static inline int xskq_produce_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>   {
>   	struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
> -
> -	if (xskq_nb_free(q, q->prod_tail, 1) == 0)
> -		return -ENOSPC;
> +	unsigned int idx = q->ring->producer;
>   
>   	/* A, matches D */
> -	ring->desc[q->prod_tail++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
> +	ring->desc[idx++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
>   
>   	/* Order producer and data */
>   	smp_wmb(); /* B, matches C */
>   
> -	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, q->prod_tail);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, idx);
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -238,11 +235,11 @@ static inline int xskq_produce_addr_lazy(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>   {
>   	struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
>   
> -	if (xskq_nb_free(q, q->prod_head, 1) == 0)
> +	if (xskq_nb_free(q, 1) == 0)
>   		return -ENOSPC;
>   
>   	/* A, matches D */
> -	ring->desc[q->prod_head++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
> +	ring->desc[q->cached_prod++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -252,17 +249,16 @@ static inline void xskq_produce_flush_addr_n(struct xsk_queue *q,
>   	/* Order producer and data */
>   	smp_wmb(); /* B, matches C */
>   
> -	q->prod_tail += nb_entries;
> -	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, q->prod_tail);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, q->ring->producer + nb_entries);
>   }
>   
>   static inline int xskq_reserve_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   {
> -	if (xskq_nb_free(q, q->prod_head, 1) == 0)
> +	if (xskq_nb_free(q, 1) == 0)
>   		return -ENOSPC;
>   
>   	/* A, matches D */
> -	q->prod_head++;
> +	q->cached_prod++;
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -340,11 +336,11 @@ static inline int xskq_produce_batch_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
>   	struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
>   	unsigned int idx;
>   
> -	if (xskq_nb_free(q, q->prod_head, 1) == 0)
> +	if (xskq_nb_free(q, 1) == 0)
>   		return -ENOSPC;
>   
>   	/* A, matches D */
> -	idx = (q->prod_head++) & q->ring_mask;
> +	idx = q->cached_prod++ & q->ring_mask;
>   	ring->desc[idx].addr = addr;
>   	ring->desc[idx].len = len;
>   
> @@ -356,8 +352,7 @@ static inline void xskq_produce_flush_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   	/* Order producer and data */
>   	smp_wmb(); /* B, matches C */
>   
> -	q->prod_tail = q->prod_head;
> -	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, q->prod_tail);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(q->ring->producer, q->cached_prod);
>   }
>   
>   static inline bool xskq_full_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
> @@ -367,7 +362,7 @@ static inline bool xskq_full_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   
>   static inline bool xskq_empty_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
>   {
> -	return xskq_nb_free(q, q->prod_tail, q->nentries) == q->nentries;
> +	return xskq_nb_free(q, q->nentries) == q->nentries;

I don't think this change is correct. The old code checked the number of 
free items against prod_tail (== producer). The new code changes it to 
prod_head (which is now cached_prod). xskq_nb_free is used in xsk_poll 
to set EPOLLIN. After this change EPOLLIN will be set right after 
xskq_produce_batch_desc, but it should only be set after 
xskq_produce_flush_desc, just as before, otherwise the application will 
wake up before the data is available, and it will just waste CPU cycles.

>   }
>   
>   void xskq_set_umem(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 size, u64 chunk_mask);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ