[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a83715c-92c3-7e3e-304d-34b1d9285138@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:16:39 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] sock: Make sk_protocol a 16-bit value
On 12/13/19 3:00 PM, Mat Martineau wrote:
> Match the 16-bit width of skbuff->protocol. Fills an 8-bit hole so
> sizeof(struct sock) does not change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 4 ++--
> include/trace/events/sock.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 81dc811aad2e..9dd225f62012 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -456,10 +456,10 @@ struct sock {
> sk_no_check_tx : 1,
> sk_no_check_rx : 1,
> sk_userlocks : 4,
> - sk_protocol : 8,
> + sk_pacing_shift : 8,
> sk_type : 16;
> + u16 sk_protocol;
> u16 sk_gso_max_segs;
> - u8 sk_pacing_shift;
Unfortunately sk_pacing_shift must not be a bit field.
I have a patch to add proper READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() on it,
since an update can be done from a lockless context ( sk_pacing_shift_update())
Powered by blists - more mailing lists