lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191213235937.naddjeklvds7akz7@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:59:38 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 12/17] libbpf: add BPF object skeleton support

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:32:09PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add new set of APIs, allowing to open/load/attach BPF object through BPF
> object skeleton, generated by bpftool for a specific BPF object file. All the
> xxx_skeleton() APIs wrap up corresponding bpf_object_xxx() APIs, but
> additionally also automate map/program lookups by name, global data
> initialization and mmap()-ing, etc.  All this greatly improves and simplifies
> userspace usability of working with BPF programs. See follow up patches for
> examples.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
...
> +int bpf_object__open_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s,
> +			      const struct bpf_object_open_opts *opts);
> +int bpf_object__load_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s);
> +int bpf_object__attach_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s);
> +void bpf_object__detach_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s);
> +void bpf_object__destroy_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s);

libbpf.map and LIBBPF_API update for them is missing ?
The intent was to expose them as stable libbpf api, right?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ