[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10108598.co7siHb18S@cg-notebook>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 22:11:01 +0100
From: Christoph Grenz <christophg+lkml@...nz-bonn.de>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Destination Options question
Hi Tom,
my receive code boils down to this Python script:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from socket import socket, AF_INET6, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_RECVDSTOPTS, SOCK_RAW
IPPROTO_MH = 135 # IPv6 Mobility Header
sock = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_MH)
sock.setsockopt(IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_RECVDSTOPTS, True)
sock.bind(('::', 0))
while True:
packet, ancdata, msg_flags, address = sock.recvmsg(1800, 512)
print(address[0], packet.hex(), ancdata)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Best regards,
Christoph
Am Samstag, 14. Dezember 2019, 12:40:16 CET schrieb Tom Herbert:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 8:19 AM Christoph Grenz
>
> <christophg+lkml@...nz-bonn.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm playing around with Mobile IPv6 and noticed a strange behaviour in the
> > Linux network system when using IPv6 destination options:
> >
> > I'm able to send destination options on SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_RAW sockets
> > with sendmsg() and IPV6_DSTOPTS ancillary data. The sent packets also
> > look correct in Wireshark.
> >
> > But I'm not able to receive packets with destination options on a socket
> > with the IPV6_RECVDSTOPTS socket option enabled. Both a packet with a
> > Home Address Option and a packet with an empty destination options header
> > (only containing padding) won't be received on a socket for the payload
> > protocol.
>
> Christoph, Can you post your receive code?
>
> Thanks
>
> > Only a SOCK_RAW socket for IPPROTO_DSTOPTS receives the packet.
> >
> > I tested this on a vanilla 5.4.0 kernel and got the same behaviour.
> > Activating dyndbg for everything in net/ipv6 didn't produce any relevant
> > output in dmesg.
> >
> > Is this expected behaviour or a bug? Or do I maybe need some other socket
> > option or a xfrm policy to receive packets with destination options?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Christoph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists