[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191216124347.GB14887@linux.fritz.box>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:43:47 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com,
andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/4] libbpf: support libbpf-provided extern
variables
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 05:47:08PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> Config file itself is searched in /boot/config-$(uname -r) location with
> fallback to /proc/config.gz, unless config path is specified explicitly
> through bpf_object_open_opts' kernel_config_path option. Both gzipped and
> plain text formats are supported. Libbpf adds explicit dependency on zlib
> because of this, but this shouldn't be a problem, given libelf already depends
> on zlib.
Hm, given this seems to break the build and is not an essential feature,
can't we use the feature detection from tooling infra which you invoke
anyway to compile out bpf_object__read_kernel_config() internals and return
an error there? Build could warn perf-style what won't be available for
the user in that case.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1210213/
Also, does libbpf.pc.template need updating wrt zlib?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists